Blogs are the New Black
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/30/fashion/30moms.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5070&en=54fdcd4a53c97a92&ex=1108184400
Beth sent this article to me earlier today. Apparently it's generating a bit of controversy, implying as it does that parental-themed blogs are really the product of attention starved former Gen X'ers who can't cope with the challenges and responsibilities that come with having kids.
Fair enough. And I agree, in part. There's a need, a healthy one if you axe me, to be seen as someone other than "Daddy" or "Mommy". My blog gives me the chance to rant and express some level of creativity. In a sense, it allows me to reinforce myself, to reaffirm the things that I'm passionate about, and to rail against the things that piss me off. I don't see it as "payback" (as one blogger interviewed in the articles asserts) for the things that accompany parenting (diapers, puke, 4:00 a.m. shrieking sessions - as my childhood hero Hunter S. Thompson says, you buy the ticket, you take the ride). I don't see parenthood as "dehumanizing and ugly" (the fussy.org author) - and I've had a kid in the hospital suffering from a life-threatening disease.
Not surprisingly, Heather Armstrong's (she who is www.dooce.com, the patron saint of blogging) comment hits the nail on the head - "The writing and voice I had let me hold onto part of the original and old Heather". (I noticed that the female bloggers interviewed for the article have a writing style that - how do I put this nicely? - "pays tribute" to Armstrong's. I've read her stuff a couple of times, but not on a regular basis as it's easy to fall into the Rip Off Pit, as most of the bloggers in that article have.)
My point? Don't know, maybe I don't even have one, and maybe that in itself is the point.




